Web browsers for mac os x
#Web browsers for mac os x mac
Even thought it has a reputation for being unstable, non-standards-compliant, and not as feature-rich as the Windows version, I still have to admit that I've been pretty happy with Communicator for the Mac at least since v. I'm now using 4.73 on an NT box (don't hit me it's the machine I have to use at work), and 4.76 on my non-OS X Mac at home. I've been using Netscape on the Mac since about version 1.0 (I think it might even have been an alpha release I picked up somewhere).
#Web browsers for mac os x software
And for a beta OS? And they say there's no software for Macs So what's everyone else's take on these four? Imagine, a platform with FOUR (more or less) viable web browsers. I might end up making it my default web browser. I especially like its handling of bookmarks. It's not the prettiest, the fastest, or the best at displaying web pages, but it seems to do a pretty good job of all of these, with no obvious weak areas. I don't like to use it for reasons that have nothing to do with its merits as a browser.īut I would have to say of the four, I'm starting to like iCab the best. Overall (and I hate to say this), Explorer seems like a halfway decent browser.
Its display of web pages seems good, if not very pretty. On the other hand, it seems to do a pretty good job of displaying most web pages, and it's reasonably fast definitely faster than OmniWeb, which seems the slowest of the four.Įxplorer seems reasonably stable, and fast, and pretty Mac-like. Fonts are ugly, and it seems the least stable of the four. Not even the scroll bars use Aqua elements they look like some kind of hacky gnome or kde scrollbars. There isn't even a Mac menu bar! Menus appear in windows, la MS Windows. It makes almost no use of Aqua in fact the only Aqua element I've been able to see is in the title bar of browser windows. Mozilla, on the other hand, is by FAR the ugliest of the four. Its handling of bookmarks and histories seems clumsy to me, despite the ability to drag a URL right to your bookmarks. And it's relatively slower than the other browsers. It has no support for Java that I'm aware of, and indifferent support for Javascript. One the other hand, I run into problems and inconsistencies displaying web-pages much more often with OmniWeb than any of the other three. have been Aqua-fied), the font handling seems the best, and as far as I know it's the only one of the four that was developed using Cocoa frameworks. The interface is pure Aqua (even web page elements like forms, buttons, dropdown lists, etc. So far, here's how I see it: OmniWeb is by the far the most beautiful of the four. I realize that all four of these browsers are beta releases, so it will be interesting to see which ones really become usable in the final releases.
So far, none of these browsers have been unusable (although Mozilla comes closest), but none of them have really been impressive, either. I've been using X PB for about a month now, and I've used all four major OS X-native browers that are available for the platform that I'm aware of (IExplorer, Mozilla, iCab, and OmniWeb).